california supreme court opinions
The opinions published on Justia State Caselaw are sourced from individual state court sites.These court opinions may not be the official published versions, and you should check your local court rules before citing to them. at p. Code 1431.2, subdivision (a) does not authorize a reduction in the liability of intentional tortfeasors for noneconomic damages based on the extent to which the negligence of other... Justia Opinion Summary: The Supreme Court held that the exemption in Cal. When the Court of Appeal ultimately filed an opinion on the merits, the Supreme Court granted review and reversed. We also maintain an archive of Opinion Summaries from September 2000 to the Present. v. Superior Court, National Lawyers Guild v. City of Hayward, Nationwide Biweekly Administration, Inc. v. Superior Court of Alameda County, Montrose Chemical Corp. of California v. Superior Court. NOTICE: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the preliminary print of the United States Reports. Tarasoff v. Regents of the University of California, 17 Cal. What is a published opinion? All rights reserved. U.S. Supreme Court lifts California's ban on indoor church services, keeps 25% capacity limit (San Fran Chronicle) Full coverage and live updates on the Coronavirus Follow me on Twitter . RSS feed for this court. The California Supreme Court consists of seven justices, including a Chief Justice and six Associate Justices. All opinions are later compiled and printed in the United States Reports, the Court’s official publication. A divided Supreme Court blocked California's Covid-related ban on indoor worship services in a late-night order Friday but allowed other restrictions affecting houses of worship to remain in place. Veh. Supreme Court of California Decisions 2020. The Supreme Court of California is the highest and final court in the courts of the U.S. state of California.It resides inside the Earl Warren Building in San Francisco, overlooking Civic Center Square along with City Hall. after Mercedes-Benz USA LLC (Mercedes) was unable to repair defects in the vehicl... Justia Opinion Summary: The Supreme Court held that when reviewing a finding that a fact has been proved by clear and convincing evidence, the appellate court must view the record in light most favorable to the prevailing party below and give d... Justia Opinion Summary: The Supreme Court answered a question from the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit regarding which presumption governs the characterization of joint tenancy property in a dispute between a couple and the... Justia Opinion Summary: The Supreme Court reversed the judgment of the court of appeal affirming Defendant's sentence in connection with his convictions for several offenses, including five counts of second degree robbery, holding that the tria... Justia Opinion Summary: The Supreme Court answered a question posed by the Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit regarding the time gap between the denial of a petition for a writ of habeas corpus in a lower California court and the filing of... Justia Opinion Summary: The Supreme Court granted the emergency petition filed by the Legislature for a peremptory writ of mandate seeking relief from redistricting deadlines set by California law in light of the delay of census data collection... Justia Opinion Summary: In this inverse condemnation action, the Supreme Court affirmed the judgment of the court of appeal reversing the judgment of the trial court, holding that the trial court erred in borrowing section 1260.040 from the Emi... Justia Opinion Summary: The Supreme Court affirmed Defendant's conviction of first degree murder and other crimes and sentence of death, holding that there was no prejudicial error in the trial proceedings. Specific... Justia Opinion Summary: The Supreme Court held that *Cal. art. Begin typing to search, use arrow keys to navigate, use enter to select. Code 601(b)... Justia Opinion Summary: The Supreme Court decided in this case that when the government seeks civil penalties as well as an injunction or other equitable remedies under the unfair competition law (UCL), Cal. Cases are browsable by date and searchable by docket number, case title, and full text. Welf & Inst. Code 702 to declare a wobbler offense to... Justia Opinion Summary: The Supreme Court granted Petitioner habeas corpus relief, holding that Petitioner was denied his constitutional right to the assistance of competent counsel at the guilt phase of his criminal trial, and trial counsel's... Justia Opinion Summary: The Supreme Court granted the request of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit to decide a question of California law regarding Industrial Welfare Commission wage order No. FindLaw offers a free RSS feed for this court. “Slip” opinions are the first version of the Court’s opinions posted on this website. 3d 425, 551 P.2d 334, 131 Cal. Ct. No. It also holds sessions in Los Angeles and Sacramento.Its decisions are binding on all other California state courts. 296, 1, amendment of the County Employees Retirement Law (CERL), Cal. Welcome to FindLaw's searchable database of Supreme Court of California decisions since January 1934. 9th Circuit Court of Appeals Newsletter - The latest case summaries and related news delivered to your inbox, from FindLaw. Both times, the Supreme Court granted review and retransferred with instructions telling the court of appeal it was wrong. Bus. Where to Obtain Supreme Court Opinions. Welf. Electronic versions of the bound volumes are posted on this website. Penal Code 1170.95 is the exclusive mech... Justia Opinion Summary: The Supreme Court reversed Defendant's conviction of fetal murder and affirmed his convictions of ten counts of murder, holding that hearsay was improperly admitted on the question of fetal viability. Justice Amy Coney Barrett's first opinion shields the EPA from being forced to release draft opinions on new rules. The Sierra Club then sued to obtain the documents, and the U.S. 9th Circuit Court of Appeals found the draft biological opinions were not privileged. The opinions published on Justia State Caselaw are sourced from individual, United Auburn Indian Community of Auburn Rancheria v. Newsom, Protecting Our Water & Environmental Resources v. County of Stanislaus, Alameda County Deputy Sheriff's Ass'n v. Alameda County Employees' Retirement Ass'n, Legislature of State of California v. Padilla, Weiss v. People ex rel. The Supreme Court established CJEO to provide written advisory opinions and confidential advice on judicial ethics issues. A “slip” opinion consists of the majority or principal opinion, any concurring or dissenting opinions written by the Justices, and a prefatory syllabus prepared by the Reporter’s Office that summarizes the decision. Section 1430(b) gives a current or former nursing care pat... Justia Opinion Summary: The Supreme Court affirmed the judgments of the of the trial court convicting Defendants of first degree murder and other crimes and sentencing both defendants to death, holding that no prejudice resulted from any error... Justia Opinion Summary: The Supreme Court affirmed Defendant's convictions for four counts of first degree murder and other crimes and sentence of death, holding that, considering any actual or assumed errors altogether, their cumulative effect... Justia Opinion Summary: Here, the Supreme Court addressed the propriety of a criminal defense subpoena served on Facebook seeking restricted posts and private messages of one of its users, who was a victim and critical witness in the underlying... Justia Opinion Summary: The Supreme Court affirmed Defendant's conviction of three counts of first degree murder and one count of second degree murder with a multiple murder special circumstance and various gun use enhancements, holding that th... Justia Opinion Summary: The Supreme Court affirmed Defendant's conviction of four counts of first degree murder and other crimes, holding that there was no error or abuse of discretion during the guilt phase or penalty phase of trial. Code Civ. Subscribe to Justia's Free Summaries The State Department of Public Health (the Dep... Justia Opinion Summary: The Supreme Court held that the unfair competition law (UCL), Cal. Microsoft Edge. Supreme Court Rules Against California Ban On In-Person Worship The court sided with two churches that said a ban on indoor church services violated their rights to free exercise of religion. 2013-002 [Issued December 11, 2013] DISCLOSURE ON THE RECORD WHEN THERE IS NO COURT REPORTER OR ELECTRONIC RECORDING OF THE PROCEEDINGS II, 9, subd. U.S. Court of Appeals (9th Circuit) Opinions - Cases and resources fromt the Court. (See id. Google Chrome, This . Department of Transportation, Saint Francis Memorial Hospital v. State Department of Public Health, Abbott Laboratories v. Superior Court of Orange County, Montrose Chemical Corp. of Cal. In the wake of the revolutionary 1995 court of appeal decision in Union Bank v. Superior Court,2 the California Supreme Court handed down its own trilogy of Harris v. City of Santa Monica - Mixed Motive aka "Same Decision" Defense in Discrimination Cases - 2013 (California Supreme Court Case No. The California Supreme Court consists of the Chief Justice and six associate justices. & Prof. Code 17200 et seq., is not limited to the geographic boundaries of Orange County and therefore does not preclude a district attorney from in... Justia Opinion Summary: In this appeal stemming from a first degree murder judgment the Supreme Court reversed the judgment of the court of appeal denying Petitioner's petition for writ of habeas corpus challenging the jury's special circumstan... Justia Opinion Summary: The Supreme Court remanded this matter to the superior court to allow Defendant an opportunity to seek relief under Senate Bill 1393, holding that the court of appeals properly concluded that a certificate of probable ca... Justia Opinion Summary: The Supreme Court affirmed the judgment of the court of appeal conditionally reversing Defendant's convictions and sentence with instructions for the trial court to consider Defendant's eligibility for diversion under Ca... Justia Opinion Summary: The Supreme Court affirmed the judgment of the trial court denying Defendant's motion to modify the jury's verdicts of burglary and first degree murder, first degree forcible rape, second degree robbery and false impriso... Justia Opinion Summary: The Supreme Court reversed the decision of the court of appeal reversing the judgment of the trial court granting a petition for writ of mandate directing the City of Hayward to refund to a records requester the charges... Justia Opinion Summary: The Supreme Court affirmed the judgment of the court of appeal finding that the trial court acted within its discretion when it denied bail to Petitioner, holding that the trial court's decision to order Petitioner detai... Justia Opinion Summary: The Supreme Court affirmed the decision of the court of appeal reversing Defendant's conviction of two counts of assault by an inmate with a deadly weapon and other offenses, holding that the prosecutor impermissibly vou... Justia Opinion Summary: The Supreme Court reversed the judgment of the court of appeal, holding that, under the facts of this case, a witness's observation of a company's name and logo appearing on an invoice was circumstantial evidence of iden... Justia Opinion Summary: The Supreme Court affirmed Defendant's conviction of three counts of first degree murder and his sentence of death, holding that the three or four minor errors at Defendant's trial were harmless and did not interfere wit... Justia Opinion Summary: The Supreme Court held that the juvenile court may exercise jurisdiction in a formal wardship proceeding on the basis of the minor having four or more truancies within one school year under Cal. The court considered 6,455 filings, including 3,682 p etitions for review from California’s six appellate court districts. Cases are browsable by date and searchable by docket number, case title, and full text. 2012, ch. To get there, the court considered nearly 7,200 filings, including about 3,900 petitions for review from approximately 18,000 judgments of the six District Courts of Appeal. & Prof. Code 17200 et seq., or... Justia Opinion Summary: The Supreme Court held that section Cal. At the California Supreme Court Review, we’ve mined dozens of data points from every one of the more than 3,000 decisions handed down by the California Supreme Court from 1990 through 2017. FindLaw offers a free The court made two significant holdings: A California statute makes it a criminal offense for a person to "be addicted to the use of narcotics." Ins. State Court Opinions. Penal Code 1203.4a, subd. A state Supreme Court committee issued an advisory opinion explaining when a judge may accept campaign contributions from a political action committee when the contribution includes funds from another political action committee organized and funded by court employees. All opinions of the California Supreme Court are published in bound volumes called the Official Reports.. & Inst. We recommend using In 1986, the U.S. Supreme Court handed down a trilogy of decisions that revolutionized summary judgment practice in federal courts and redefined the relationship between judge and jury.' : S243855 Opinion Decided: Monday, August 26, 2019 More Opinions by Date >> double jeopardy 1983 excessive force parole search statutory interpretation felony california negligence police brutality probation issue preclusion wrongful death Assault due process civil procedure battery preshooting criminal law collateral estoppel preemption from September 2000 to the Present.